EU Pay Transparency Directive: what employers need to know
DIRECTIVE 2023/970
UPDATED MARCH 2026
The directive takes effect on 7 June 2026. This page covers the requirements, deadlines by company size, and what you should be doing right now.
Each section links to a detailed guide if you need to go deeper.
until the law takes effect
and the first reports are due
TL;DR
- The EU Pay Transparency Directive requires all EU member states to pass national laws by 7 June 2026.
- The directive applies to every employer in the EU. Reporting obligations kick in at 100+ employees.
- Companies must disclose salary ranges in job postings, respond to employee pay information requests, and report gender pay gaps publicly.
- If your pay gap exceeds 5% in any worker category and you can't justify it with objective criteria, you must conduct a joint pay assessment with worker representatives.
- Reporting the gap is the easy part. Justifying it is where most companies get stuck, because justification requires linking pay decisions to documented performance data.
What is the EU Pay Transparency Directive?
Directive (EU) 2023/970 was adopted in April 2023 and published on 17 May 2023. It strengthens the principle of equal pay for equal work or work of equal value between men and women across all 27 EU member states.
The gender pay gap in the EU sits at roughly 12%-13%. The directive targets this gap through mandatory salary disclosure, public reporting, and a requirement that employers justify pay differences with objective, gender-neutral criteria.
It applies to all employers, public and private. The reporting obligations apply to companies with 100 or more employees, but the transparency measures (salary ranges in job postings, employee information rights) apply regardless of company size.
For a full breakdown of every requirement, including employee communication guidance and frequently asked questions, read our guide to the EU Pay Transparency Directive requirements and employer obligations.
Key deadlines at a glance
7 June 2026 is when national laws take effect across all EU member states. From that date, salary transparency in recruitment, employee information rights, and pay structure requirements become legally enforceable.
7 June 2027 is when companies with 150 or more employees must submit their first gender pay gap report. The report covers 2026 payroll data, which means you need tracking in place from the moment the directive goes live.
7 June 2031 is when reporting extends to companies with 100 to 149 employees, covering 2030 payroll data.
Reporting frequency by company size
| Company size | First report due | Frequency |
|---|---|---|
| 250+ employees | June 2027 | Every year |
| 150-249 employees | June 2027 | Every 3 years |
| 100-149 employees | June 2031 | Every 3 years |
| Under 100 employees | Not required | Member states may extend |
As of January 2026, only Belgium and Czechia have formally notified the European Commission of transposition measures. Most member states are still drafting or finalizing legislation.
For the full timeline from 2023 to 2031, a country-by-country transposition tracker, and a month-by-month compliance checklist, see our EU Pay Transparency Directive deadlines and compliance checklist.
Salary transparency in recruitment
Employers must include a salary range in job postings or provide it before the first interview. Asking candidates about their salary history is banned. Job titles must use gender-neutral language.
Some competitors already publish salary ranges by default. Companies that don't will lose candidates to those that do, long before regulators come knocking.
Pay information rights for employees
Employees can request their individual pay level and the average pay for workers doing the same job, broken down by gender. Employers must respond within two months. Pay secrecy clauses are banned.
Employees are already asking these questions. The directive provides them with a legal mechanism to obtain answers.
Gender pay gap reporting
Companies above the reporting thresholds must report:
- Gender pay gap (mean and median)
- Gender pay gap in bonuses and variable pay
- Proportion of men and women receiving bonuses
- Distribution across pay quartiles
- Gender pay gap by category of workers
Reports are submitted to your national monitoring body and are publicly available.
Joint pay assessment
If your report shows a gender pay gap of 5% or more in any worker category, you need to justify it with objective criteria. If you can't, you must conduct a joint pay assessment with worker representatives.
You have six months to act before the assessment becomes mandatory. This is where most companies struggle.
The compliance gap most companies miss
The question regulators will ask is not "Do you have a pay gap?" because most companies do. The question is, "Why does it exist?"
Article 4.3 of the directive lists what counts as a valid justification: skills, effort, responsibility, working conditions, and performance level. Notice that last one. Performance level is an acceptable reason for paying two people in the same role differently. But only if you can document it.
When someone asks, "Why does this person earn more than that person?" can you answer with documented data? Most companies end up digging through separate tools, inconsistent review records, and undocumented decisions.
A pay equity audit tool can calculate your gap. It can tell you that women in engineering earn 6% less than men. What it can't tell you is whether that gap correlates with performance ratings, OKR achievement, or differences in seniority. And that's what Article 4.3 requires.
The Littler survey number (24% feeling very prepared) makes more sense in this context. Running a pay gap report is not hard. Building the infrastructure to justify what the report reveals is the real work, and most organizations haven't started.
How to prepare before June 2026
You don't need a 50-page compliance plan. You need five things done well, in roughly this order.
-
01
Run a pay equity audit
You can't fix what you haven't measured. Pull your compensation data, segment by gender and worker category, and flag every gap above 5%. Document whether each gap can be justified with objective criteria. The January section of our compliance checklist walks through it step by step.
-
02
Update your recruitment process
Every job posting needs a salary range. Interview guides need to drop salary history questions. Job titles need gender-neutral language. These changes apply to all employers from June 2026, regardless of size. See pre-employment transparency requirements.
-
03
Connect compensation data to performance records
When a gap shows up in your report, you'll need to explain it with documented evidence. Build that link now, not after a regulator asks. Read about the role of performance data in pay transparency compliance.
-
04
Test your reporting systems
Can your HRIS generate the required metrics? Run a dry report using 2025 data. If you're pulling numbers into a spreadsheet and reconciling manually, test that workflow under time pressure. Our March checklist section covers system readiness.
-
05
Tell your people what's changing
Hiring managers need to know about salary range disclosure. HR teams need a process for handling information requests. Employees need to understand their new rights. The earlier you communicate, the fewer surprises in June 2026. See our employee communication framework.
Each step has a detailed walkthrough. The directive requirements guide covers the what. The deadlines and compliance checklist covers the when. Start with whichever matches where you are right now.
How Mirro helps with EU pay transparency compliance
Compliance with this directive requires two things that most organizations keep in separate systems: compensation data for reporting and performance data for justification. Mirro is an HRIS that puts both in one place.
Gap analysis and reporting
Analyze gender pay gaps by role, department, and worker category. Break down pay quartiles and segment bonuses using live HRIS data. Eliminate exports, avoid spreadsheet reconciliation, and prevent version mismatches between systems.
Performance justification
When a gap exceeds 5%, Mirro shows performance context alongside compensation data. Ratings, OKR achievement, and competency assessments linked to salary records. The documented answer to "Why does this person earn more?" is already there.
Ongoing monitoring
Monitor pay gaps quarterly and conduct performance-adjusted analyses that track trends over time. Catch emerging gaps before they become audit findings. Respond to employee requests from one system instead of pulling data from four.
Further reading
The complete guide to the EU Pay Transparency Directive
Start here if you're new to the directive. Every requirement, a 6-step preparation framework, employee communication guidance, and frequently asked questions.
Deadlines 2026-2031 and compliance checklist
Full timeline from adoption to rollout. Country-by-country transposition tracker, deadlines by company size, and a month-by-month checklist for January through June 2026.
Why performance data is the missing link
The directive requires justifying pay gaps, not just reporting them. Why standalone audit tools fall short and how integrated performance data changes the equation.
-
Does the EU Pay Transparency Directive apply to non-EU companies?
-
What is the difference between pay transparency and pay equity?
-
Can we use Excel or basic HRIS tools to comply?
-
What happens if our pay gap exceeds 5%?
-
Where can I check my country's transposition status?
If your company employs workers in the EU, it applies. The obligations follow the employee's location, not the employer's headquarters. A US-based company with 200 employees in Germany must comply with the German transposition of the directive. A UK company with a subsidiary in France must comply with the French version.
Pay transparency means disclosing pay information: salary ranges in job postings, gender pay gap reports, and the criteria behind pay decisions. Pay equity means ensuring equal pay for equal work. The directive targets both. Transparency is the mechanism. Equity is the goal. Transparency is the mechanism. Equity is the goal. You can be transparent about an unfair pay structure, but the directive requires you to justify every gap or close it.
You can track salary data in Excel or a basic payroll system. For the reporting side alone, that might work. But the directive also requires justifying gaps above 5% using objective criteria such as performance level. A spreadsheet can't link a pay decision to a performance review. It can't segment gap analysis by performance quartile. And it can't respond to an employee information request with auditable, documented data within the two-month deadline.
A gap above 5% is not automatic non-compliance. If you can justify it with objective, gender-neutral criteria (documented performance differences, seniority, specialized skills), the gap is defensible. The problem is when you can't justify it. In that case, you must conduct a joint pay assessment with worker representatives, identify the causes, and develop corrective measures. The risk is not having a gap but not being able to explain it.
Our country-by-country transposition tracker covers all 27 EU member states with links to official government sources. It's updated monthly. As of January 2026, most countries are still drafting legislation, with only Belgium and Czechia having formally notified the European Commission.
